Just don’t expect to see a Tegra X1 tablet perform this well. This is by no means a fair matchup and we need to be clear about this – the SHIELD Android TV has no throttling or power constraints, no need to balance out energy efficiency – but it at least gives us some idea of how the device and Tegra X1 compare to other products. Ultimately it’s clear that the SHIELD Android TV is heavily overspeced compared to other Android TV devices – no one else is pursuing this premium market – so instead we’re going to focus on looking at benchmarked performance relative to the newest generation of SoCs in the latest iOS and Android tablets. The Nexus Player is a quad-core Intel Atom, but only includes 1GB of RAM, among other limitations. At the same time however, if we restrict ourselves to just Android TV devices, it would be a very limited and uninteresting comparison. A set top box is not a mobile device, and while they share similar OSes and the same families of SoCs, that does not make them identical devices. Google’s Nexus Player is most of the market right now, and only very recently have other Android TV devices such as the Forge TV and SHIELD Android TV reached the market.Īs a result, figuring out what to compare the SHIELD Android TV to and how to present it has been an interesting challenge. Simply put, the Android TV market is still a tiny market. From an editorial perspective, the SHIELD Android TV may be one of the most frustrating devices we’ve worked on in recent history.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |